Perpetua vs Quartile, compared

Perpetua vs Quartile: which one fits your operation.

Twelve criteria, both columns sourced and dated, plus what G2 reviewers said when they compared the two directly. No sponsored placements and no affiliate links.

Short answer

Perpetua vs Quartile: the short answer

Perpetua if you want a price you can evaluate today and hands-off Amazon automation; Quartile if your retail media plan already runs past the marketplaces and you want people attached to it. Perpetua and Quartile both automate retail media, but they meet the buyer at opposite ends of the sales process. Perpetua puts its price on the page — $695 a month for Essentials while you are under $10,000 of monthly ad spend, then a percentage of spend above it — and sells goal-based automation to third-party sellers and challenger brands on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart, with growth capital attached. Quartile publishes no price and starts with a demo, but spreads across more channels and more customer sizes: 5,300+ customers in 32 countries, Amazon Ads and DSP plus Walmart, Instacart, Criteo, Google, Meta and Microsoft, with a dedicated account team on every plan. On G2 Quartile rates 4.6 from 215 reviews against Perpetua's 4.4 from 79, and neither publishes a free trial.

Last updated:

Perpetua vs Quartile: what actually separates them

  • One publishes, one does not. Perpetua lists $695/month and the ad-spend thresholds that move you between tiers. Quartile publishes nothing and quotes after a demo. If you need to compare cost before committing time, only one of the two is comparable at all.
  • Channel set. Perpetua concentrates on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart. Quartile adds Criteo-served retailers, Google, Meta and Microsoft — useful if your retail media plan already runs past the marketplaces.
  • How the automation is framed. Perpetua asks you to set a goal and lets its machine learning pick the tactics. Quartile pairs its optimisation with a dedicated account team. One is more hands-off software; the other is closer to software plus service.
  • The extras. Perpetua bundles growth capital — financing, not a feature Quartile offers. Quartile states ISO/IEC 27001 certification, which Perpetua does not publish. Neither extra changes what the advertising engine does.
Before the table

What each one actually is.

Two paragraphs, no adjectives from us — what the product does and who it is sold to.

Perpetua

Perpetua is goal-based advertising automation for Amazon, Walmart and Instacart. You set a target and its machine learning runs the bidding and keyword tactics to reach it, with hourly intraday adjustment on higher tiers. It also bundles growth capital, a financing product. Entry is $695 a month while monthly ad spend stays under $10,000, then a percentage of spend on top.

Their site: perpetua.io/pricing ↗

Quartile

Quartile is a retail media optimisation platform. It automates advertising across Amazon Ads and DSP, Walmart, Instacart, Criteo-served retailers such as Target and Best Buy, plus Google, Meta and Microsoft, and reports on ROAS. It serves more than 5,300 customers across 32 countries, from small business to enterprise, pairs the software with a dedicated account team, and quotes pricing only after a demo.

Their site: quartile.com ↗
Side by side

Perpetua vs Quartile, criterion by criterion

Scroll the table sideways to see both columns

Feature and pricing comparison — Perpetua / Quartile
Criterion Perpetua Quartile
Company & HQ Who you are buying from and where support sits Perpetua — US (Portsmouth, NH); part of Flywheel Digital, owned by Omnicom since January 2024 US company (New York per third-party profiles); its own site states only global coverage, 32 countries
Built for The segment the product is actually designed around Third-party sellers and challenger brands on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart Small business to enterprise advertisers, marketplaces plus D2C channels
Public entry price Lowest published price — many vendors publish none Essentials $695/mo up to $10K monthly ad spend; Growth $695/mo + % of ad spend above it; Premium custom Not published — quote after a demo
Estimated cost at $25K/mo ad spend Our arithmetic on their published figures — not a quote from them Above the $10K Essentials cap you are on Growth: $695/mo plus a percentage of spend, reported up to ~3% — roughly $1,400/mo Not publishable — no price of any kind is published, so no worked figure exists
Pricing model A % of ad spend means your bill grows as you scale Flat fee at entry; growth tiers add up to ~3% of managed ad spend Not published
Commitment and setup fees Monthly or annual, and what you pay before you start Monthly on its published page — no annual billing option shown, no setup fee stated Not published — terms come with the quote after a demo
Platform scope Advertising only, or advertising + listings + stock + P&L Goal-based advertising automation + integrated growth capital Advertising only: Amazon Ads + DSP, Walmart, Instacart, Criteo, Google, Meta, Microsoft
Channels covered Whether it reaches past Amazon to Walmart, Instacart or Criteo Amazon, Walmart and Instacart Amazon Ads and DSP, Walmart, Instacart, Criteo retailers such as Target and Best Buy, Google, Meta, Microsoft
1P (Vendor) or 3P (Seller) Vendor Central work is a different product from Seller Central Built around third-party sellers and challenger brands; Vendor Central depth not detailed Not detailed publicly; sells from small business to enterprise across marketplaces and D2C
Free trial Can you evaluate it before a sales call No free trial and no annual billing on its public pricing page Not published — demo request
Human approval (HITL) & audit trail Whether AI acts on your account before a person signs off Goal-based automation executes tactics on its own; an approval queue is not documented Dedicated account team; a per-change approval queue is not documented publicly
True profit per ASIN TACOS, COGS, fees and net margin — not just ACOS Ad-centric reporting with hourly optimisation; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented ROAS-led reporting (claims +41% ROAS); per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented
GEO — listings optimised for Rufus & AI assistants The discovery surface advertising tools ignore Not documented Not documented on its site
Amazon EU depth ES, IT, DE, FR, UK as first-class markets, not translations EMEA presence inherited from Sellics; Amazon EU depth not detailed publicly 32 countries covered; Amazon EU-specific depth not detailed
EU data & AI Act posture Where your commercial data lives and how AI use is governed EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly ISO/IEC 27001 certified; EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Open to your AI agents (MCP) Can Claude/ChatGPT query the platform on your behalf MCP or agent access not documented publicly MCP or agent access not documented publicly

The cost row is our arithmetic on the figures each vendor publishes, at a common $25,000 of monthly ad spend. It is an estimate for comparison, not a quote from either company.

Competitor data verified on from the public sources below. Capabilities a vendor does not document publicly are marked as such rather than denied. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.

Sources: perpetua.io/pricing Omnicom closes Flywheel Digital acquisition Flywheel Digital — Perpetua-powered automation quartile.com Quartile — About us (ISO/IEC 27001) Quartile company profile (Crunchbase)

The European question

And if you sell on Amazon Spain, Italy or Germany?

Almost every comparison of these two is written for a US seller. Here is what each one publishes about the European marketplaces, where your commercial data sits, and which currency you are billed in.

Perpetua

Amazon EU depth
EMEA presence inherited from Sellics; Amazon EU depth not detailed publicly
Where your data sits
EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Currency you are billed in
Publishes in dollars, so your cost moves with the exchange rate.

Quartile

Amazon EU depth
32 countries covered; Amazon EU-specific depth not detailed
Where your data sits
ISO/IEC 27001 certified; EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Currency you are billed in
Publishes in dollars, so your cost moves with the exchange rate.
The verdict

Which of the two fits your operation.

Neither product is better in the abstract. Here is the case for each, on the criteria that decide it.

Choose Perpetua if…

  • You want to set a goal and step away — its "create goals, not campaigns" model is built for hands-off 3P advertising.
  • You need working capital fast: Perpetua Capital offers up to £3M in 24 hours via Yardline and Ritmo, inside the platform.
  • You also advertise on Walmart and Instacart in North America and want one 3P-focused ad engine for all three.

Choose Quartile if…

  • Your priority is one ad console across retail media and D2C at once — Amazon DSP, Walmart, Instacart, Criteo, Google, Meta and Microsoft Ads.
  • You want a managed-service feel: Quartile pairs the platform with a dedicated account team on every plan.
  • Advertising is the only workflow you need to centralise — listings, catalogue and stock stay with other tools.
A third option

If neither fits: what Epinium does that neither of them documents.

The rows below are the ones where Epinium ships a capability and neither Perpetua nor Quartile documents one. Anything either of them already does is not on this list.

Where both land in the same place — and why Epinium is the alternative to the pair

  • Both stop at advertising. Neither documents listing rewriting, catalogue control or stock forecasting. If a listing is wrong or a bestseller is about to go out of stock, neither platform is where you find out. Epinium runs all of it on the same data as the ads.
  • Neither documents a per-change approval queue. Goal-based automation and a dedicated account team are both good answers to "who runs it" — neither is an answer to "what stops a bad change reaching my account". Epinium queues every AI change for a human, with an audit trail and a lock on sensitive actions.
  • Both report on ads, not on profit. Perpetua gives hourly ad-centric reporting; Quartile leads with ROAS. Neither documents a per-ASIN P&L with COGS and fees. Epinium reports revenue, ad cost, COGS and net margin per ASIN, and steers on TACOS against real margin.
  • Neither lets you try it first, and neither is European. No free trial on either public offer, and no documented EU data residency or AI Act posture on either side. Epinium is free to start with no credit card, is a European company with data in the EU under GDPR, and treats ES, IT, DE, FR and UK as first-class marketplaces.
Start free

Free to start · No credit card

Capabilities neither Perpetua nor Quartile documents
Criterion Neither of the two Epinium
Human approval (HITL) & audit trail Goal-based automation executes tactics on its own; an approval queue is not documented Dedicated account team; a per-change approval queue is not documented publicly Yes — approval queue, HITL lock on sensitive actions, full audit trail
GEO — listings optimised for Rufus & AI assistants Not documented Not documented on its site Yes — listing optimisation for Rufus and other AI assistants
True profit per ASIN Ad-centric reporting with hourly optimisation; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented ROAS-led reporting (claims +41% ROAS); per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented Yes — P&L per ASIN with TACOS, COGS and net margin
Open to your AI agents (MCP) MCP or agent access not documented publicly MCP or agent access not documented publicly Yes — Epinium MCP, with OAuth2 scopes and an audit trail
Free trial No free trial and no annual billing on its public pricing page Not published — demo request Yes — free to start, no credit card

Epinium rates 4.8/5 on G2 — from 9 reviews, far fewer than either product above. Judge the number and the sample together. G2 ↗ See Epinium pricing

What our clients say

Epinium on G2
Epinium on Capterra
Amazon App Store
Epinium on Trustpilot
Amazon Verified Partner
500+ EU brands run Amazon with Epinium
KiliagonPepsiKoroshiNutribenJordi OrdóñezGerminalRoicosFotoprixnut&meHumydryBigBuyEduca BorrasFlowerKook Time

Still weighing Perpetua vs Quartile? Try the third option free.

The right AI tools for every Full Commerce challenge

Frequently asked questions

Perpetua or Quartile — which is better for an Amazon-only seller?

If Amazon is your only channel, Quartile's advantage — Criteo retailers, Google, Meta, Microsoft — is spend you are not making. Perpetua concentrates on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart and publishes an entry price you can evaluate today. The caveat is the $10K monthly ad-spend ceiling on Essentials: cross it and you move to a percentage of spend.

Can I try Perpetua or Quartile before buying?

Neither publishes a free trial. Perpetua's pricing page lists no trial and no annual billing; Quartile routes you to a demo request. Epinium is free to start with no credit card, so you can connect an account and see the platform against your own data before any commercial conversation.

Is there an alternative to both that covers more than advertising?

Yes — Epinium. Both Perpetua and Quartile are advertising platforms: the listing, the catalogue and the stock sit outside what they document. Epinium runs advertising, listing rewriting including GEO for Rufus, catalogue control and inventory forecasting in one platform, with human approval before any AI change reaches Amazon and a P&L per ASIN behind the decisions.

What is the alternative to both Perpetua and Quartile?

Epinium. Against Perpetua (Essentials $695/mo up to $10K monthly ad spend; Growth $695/mo + % of ad spend above it; Premium custom) and Quartile (Not published — quote after a demo), Epinium publishes its pricing: Guru from €159/mo, Business €349 and Master €799, plus an advertising commission that tapers from 5% to 2% with volume and applies only to the spend it manages. It also goes past advertising — listings, catalogue, stock and per-ASIN P&L — with human approval before AI touches your account. Detail on Epinium pricing. Both competitors' data verified on 15 August 2026 from public sources.

Do Perpetua or Quartile optimise listings for Rufus?

Perpetua: Not documented. Quartile: Not documented on its site. Epinium does optimise your listings to rank in Rufus and other AI shopping assistants — see GEO / AI search. To be precise: Epinium optimises for that surface; it does not measure your share of voice inside it.