Pacvue vs Perpetua, compared

Pacvue vs Perpetua: which one fits your operation.

Twelve criteria, both columns sourced and dated, plus what G2 reviewers said when they compared the two directly. No sponsored placements and no affiliate links.

Short answer

Pacvue vs Perpetua: the short answer

If you spend at enterprise scale and need 1P revenue recovery, Pacvue is the fit; if you are a 3P seller who wants to set a goal and step away, Perpetua is. Pacvue and Perpetua get shortlisted together, but they are built for different buyers and owned by different companies — Pacvue by Assembly since 2021, Perpetua by Omnicom since January 2024, through Flywheel Digital. Pacvue is an enterprise commerce operating system: retail media across more than 100 retailer networks, digital shelf monitoring, supply-chain signals and Amazon 1P revenue recovery, designed around advertisers spending several million dollars a year, with no price published anywhere. Perpetua is goal-based advertising automation for third-party sellers on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart: you set a target and its machine learning runs the tactics, from $695 a month while monthly ad spend stays under $10,000, with a percentage of spend above that. On G2, Pacvue rates 4.5 from 23 reviews and Perpetua 4.4 from 79.

Last updated:

Pacvue vs Perpetua: what actually separates them

  • Weight class. Pacvue is designed around enterprise and CPG advertisers spending over $3M a year; Perpetua is designed around third-party sellers, with its entry plan capped at $10K of monthly ad spend. They rarely compete for the same account.
  • Price transparency. Perpetua publishes $695/month and its tier thresholds. Pacvue publishes nothing — third parties report roughly $500/month plus 2–3% of ad spend, with an average contract near $26,000 a year. One you can budget from a web page; the other needs a sales call.
  • Breadth against depth. Pacvue spans 100+ retail networks and adds 1P revenue recovery, iROAS incrementality and an MCP server. Perpetua concentrates on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart with goal-based automation you set once, plus integrated growth capital — a financing product Pacvue does not offer.
  • Not the same owner. A persistent myth puts them under one roof. Pacvue was acquired by Assembly in 2021. Perpetua went to Ascential, then into Flywheel Digital, which Omnicom bought and closed on in January 2024. Two different holding groups, two separate roadmaps.
Before the table

What each one actually is.

Two paragraphs, no adjectives from us — what the product does and who it is sold to.

Pacvue

Pacvue is an enterprise commerce operating system. It buys and manages retail media across more than 100 retailer networks, monitors the digital shelf, surfaces supply-chain signals and recovers Amazon 1P revenue through chargeback, shortage and co-op claims. It sells through a demo, publishes no pricing, and is designed around advertisers spending several million dollars a year.

Their site: pacvue.com ↗

Perpetua

Perpetua is goal-based advertising automation for Amazon, Walmart and Instacart. You set a target and its machine learning runs the bidding and keyword tactics to reach it, with hourly intraday adjustment on higher tiers. It also bundles growth capital, a financing product. Entry is $695 a month while monthly ad spend stays under $10,000, then a percentage of spend on top.

Their site: perpetua.io/pricing ↗
Side by side

Pacvue vs Perpetua, criterion by criterion

Scroll the table sideways to see both columns

Feature and pricing comparison — Pacvue / Perpetua
Criterion Pacvue Perpetua
Company & HQ Who you are buying from and where support sits Pacvue — US (Seattle), part of the Assembly / Advent-backed group Perpetua — US (Portsmouth, NH); part of Flywheel Digital, owned by Omnicom since January 2024
Built for The segment the product is actually designed around Enterprise and CPG brands plus global agencies, typically >$3M/yr ad spend Third-party sellers and challenger brands on Amazon, Walmart and Instacart
Public entry price Lowest published price — many vendors publish none Not published; third parties report ~$500/mo + 2–3% of ad spend, average contract ≈ $26,000/yr Essentials $695/mo up to $10K monthly ad spend; Growth $695/mo + % of ad spend above it; Premium custom
Estimated cost at $25K/mo ad spend Our arithmetic on their published figures — not a quote from them Not publishable — no public price. Third-party reports of ~$500/mo + 2–3% would put it near $1,000–1,250/mo Above the $10K Essentials cap you are on Growth: $695/mo plus a percentage of spend, reported up to ~3% — roughly $1,400/mo
Pricing model A % of ad spend means your bill grows as you scale Subscription plus a take rate on the ad spend it manages Flat fee at entry; growth tiers add up to ~3% of managed ad spend
Commitment and setup fees Monthly or annual, and what you pay before you start Not published; third parties report an average contract near $26,000/yr, implying an annual commitment Monthly on its published page — no annual billing option shown, no setup fee stated
Platform scope Advertising only, or advertising + listings + stock + P&L Retail media + digital shelf + supply-chain signals + 1P revenue recovery, 100+ marketplaces Goal-based advertising automation + integrated growth capital
Channels covered Whether it reaches past Amazon to Walmart, Instacart or Criteo 100+ retailer networks — Amazon, Walmart, Target, Instacart, Kroger, DoorDash, eBay and more Amazon, Walmart and Instacart
1P (Vendor) or 3P (Seller) Vendor Central work is a different product from Seller Central Both, and the only one here with Amazon 1P revenue recovery — chargebacks, shortages, co-op claims Built around third-party sellers and challenger brands; Vendor Central depth not detailed
Free trial Can you evaluate it before a sales call No — enterprise demo and consultative sales No free trial and no annual billing on its public pricing page
Human approval (HITL) & audit trail Whether AI acts on your account before a person signs off Rule-based automation and alerts; a per-change human approval queue is not documented publicly Goal-based automation executes tactics on its own; an approval queue is not documented
True profit per ASIN TACOS, COGS, fees and net margin — not just ACOS Revenue Recovery and iROAS incrementality; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented Ad-centric reporting with hourly optimisation; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented
GEO — listings optimised for Rufus & AI assistants The discovery surface advertising tools ignore Runs ads inside ChatGPT (OpenAI pilot partner); listing optimisation for Rufus not documented Not documented
Amazon EU depth ES, IT, DE, FR, UK as first-class markets, not translations Global coverage; European retail media largely via Criteo and Unlimitail partnerships EMEA presence inherited from Sellics; Amazon EU depth not detailed publicly
EU data & AI Act posture Where your commercial data lives and how AI use is governed EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Open to your AI agents (MCP) Can Claude/ChatGPT query the platform on your behalf Yes — Pacvue Report MCP server exposing data from 13+ retail platforms MCP or agent access not documented publicly

The cost row is our arithmetic on the figures each vendor publishes, at a common $25,000 of monthly ad spend. It is an estimate for comparison, not a quote from either company.

Competitor data verified on from the public sources below. Capabilities a vendor does not document publicly are marked as such rather than denied. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.

Sources: pacvue.com Pacvue MCP server announcement Pacvue pricing guide (Atom11) perpetua.io/pricing Omnicom closes Flywheel Digital acquisition Flywheel Digital — Perpetua-powered automation

The European question

And if you sell on Amazon Spain, Italy or Germany?

Almost every comparison of these two is written for a US seller. Here is what each one publishes about the European marketplaces, where your commercial data sits, and which currency you are billed in.

Pacvue

Amazon EU depth
Global coverage; European retail media largely via Criteo and Unlimitail partnerships
Where your data sits
EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Currency you are billed in
Publishes in dollars, so your cost moves with the exchange rate.

Perpetua

Amazon EU depth
EMEA presence inherited from Sellics; Amazon EU depth not detailed publicly
Where your data sits
EU data residency and AI Act posture not documented publicly
Currency you are billed in
Publishes in dollars, so your cost moves with the exchange rate.
The verdict

Which of the two fits your operation.

Neither product is better in the abstract. Here is the case for each, on the criteria that decide it.

Choose Pacvue if…

  • You are an enterprise or CPG brand spending well over $3M a year on retail media across 100+ networks — that is exactly its design point.
  • You need Amazon 1P revenue recovery (chargebacks, shortages, co-op claims) and incrementality measurement such as iROAS.
  • Your global agency already runs on it — Pacvue has preferred partnerships with holding companies like GroupM and Dentsu.

Choose Perpetua if…

  • You want to set a goal and step away — its "create goals, not campaigns" model is built for hands-off 3P advertising.
  • You need working capital fast: Perpetua Capital offers up to £3M in 24 hours via Yardline and Ritmo, inside the platform.
  • You also advertise on Walmart and Instacart in North America and want one 3P-focused ad engine for all three.
A third option

If neither fits: what Epinium does that neither of them documents.

The rows below are the ones where Epinium ships a capability and neither Pacvue nor Perpetua documents one. Anything either of them already does is not on this list.

Where both land in the same place — and why Epinium is the alternative to the pair

  • Both are advertising-first. Neither documents listing rewriting, catalogue control or stock forecasting as part of the core platform. Epinium runs advertising, listings, catalogue and inventory in one place, so the decision that fixes a stockout and the decision that cuts a bid are taken against the same data.
  • Neither documents a per-change approval queue. Pacvue automates on rules, Perpetua on goals — in both cases the system acts on your account and tells you afterwards. Epinium holds every AI change for a human to approve, edit or reject, with an audit trail and an HITL lock on the sensitive ones.
  • Neither documents GEO for Rufus. Pacvue buys ads inside ChatGPT as an OpenAI pilot partner, which is a different thing: paid placement, not organic listing content written for the assistant. Epinium optimises the listing itself so it can be picked up by Rufus and other AI shopping assistants.
  • Neither documents EU data residency or an AI Act posture, and both add a percentage of ad spend as you scale. Epinium is a European company with data in the EU under GDPR, aligned with the EU AI Act, built for ES, IT, DE, FR and UK as first-class marketplaces — and its commission goes down, from 5% to 2%, as your volume goes up.
Start free

Free to start · No credit card

Capabilities neither Pacvue nor Perpetua documents
Criterion Neither of the two Epinium
Human approval (HITL) & audit trail Rule-based automation and alerts; a per-change human approval queue is not documented publicly Goal-based automation executes tactics on its own; an approval queue is not documented Yes — approval queue, HITL lock on sensitive actions, full audit trail
GEO — listings optimised for Rufus & AI assistants Runs ads inside ChatGPT (OpenAI pilot partner); listing optimisation for Rufus not documented Not documented Yes — listing optimisation for Rufus and other AI assistants
True profit per ASIN Revenue Recovery and iROAS incrementality; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented Ad-centric reporting with hourly optimisation; per-ASIN P&L with COGS not documented Yes — P&L per ASIN with TACOS, COGS and net margin
Free trial No — enterprise demo and consultative sales No free trial and no annual billing on its public pricing page Yes — free to start, no credit card

Epinium rates 4.8/5 on G2 — from 9 reviews, far fewer than either product above. Judge the number and the sample together. G2 ↗ See Epinium pricing

What our clients say

Epinium on G2
Epinium on Capterra
Amazon App Store
Epinium on Trustpilot
Amazon Verified Partner
500+ EU brands run Amazon with Epinium
KiliagonPepsiKoroshiNutribenJordi OrdóñezGerminalRoicosFotoprixnut&meHumydryBigBuyEduca BorrasFlowerKook Time

Still weighing Pacvue vs Perpetua? Try the third option free.

The right AI tools for every Full Commerce challenge

Frequently asked questions

Are Pacvue and Perpetua owned by the same company?

No. Pacvue was acquired by Assembly in 2021, an ecommerce software group backed by Advent International. Perpetua was acquired by Ascential, became part of Flywheel Digital, and has belonged to Omnicom since that acquisition closed in January 2024. Two different holding groups, which is why their pricing models and target customers differ so sharply.

Which is cheaper, Pacvue or Perpetua?

Only one of them lets you answer that from a web page. Perpetua publishes $695/month for Essentials, up to $10K of monthly ad spend, then a percentage of spend on the Growth tier. Pacvue publishes no pricing; third parties report roughly $500/month plus 2–3% of ad spend, with an average contract around $26,000 a year. At mid-market spend Perpetua is usually the smaller invoice; at enterprise spend both scale with a take rate on the budget you are already paying Amazon.

Is there a European alternative to both Pacvue and Perpetua?

Yes — Epinium. Both Pacvue and Perpetua are US companies, and neither documents EU data residency or a position on the EU AI Act. Epinium is a European company: your commercial data stays in the EU under GDPR, it is aligned with the EU AI Act, it is not used to train models without your consent, and Spain, Italy, Germany, France and the UK are first-class marketplaces with localised keyword data rather than a translated US engine.

What is the alternative to both Pacvue and Perpetua?

Epinium. Against Pacvue (Not published; third parties report ~$500/mo + 2–3% of ad spend, average contract ≈ $26,000/yr) and Perpetua (Essentials $695/mo up to $10K monthly ad spend; Growth $695/mo + % of ad spend above it; Premium custom), Epinium publishes its pricing: Guru from €159/mo, Business €349 and Master €799, plus an advertising commission that tapers from 5% to 2% with volume and applies only to the spend it manages. It also goes past advertising — listings, catalogue, stock and per-ASIN P&L — with human approval before AI touches your account. Detail on Epinium pricing. Both competitors' data verified on 15 August 2026 from public sources.

Do Pacvue or Perpetua optimise listings for Rufus?

Pacvue: Runs ads inside ChatGPT (OpenAI pilot partner); listing optimisation for Rufus not documented. Perpetua: Not documented. Epinium does optimise your listings to rank in Rufus and other AI shopping assistants — see GEO / AI search. To be precise: Epinium optimises for that surface; it does not measure your share of voice inside it.